Democrats Stunned by G.O.P. Opposition Research: “Turns Out Kamala’s Nasty and Angry,” Owned Dem Admits
As President Trump and Republicans unleashed their first round of attacks on Democratic Party vice presidential selection Kamala Harris, Democrats were woefully asking themselves why Joe Biden didn’t do a better job of vetting the alleged black woman.
“Why do we have to hear it from Republicans first that Kamala was nasty?” asked House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, after being told that fake-news fact-checkers confirmed Ms. Harris had been mean to Trump’s Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh. “I’m shocked.”
Democrats wailed at the further surprise revelation from Republican opposition research that Biden’s pick was an “angry” black woman.
“It’s one thing if white people are righteously indignant, like President Trump,” commented an Alabama visitor in a MAGA hat. “It’s another thing — downright frightening — when someone with dark skin reveals her violent hatred of all white people and America by criticizing the president’s brilliant handling of the coronavirus hoax.”
After the president’s son Eric Trump endorsed a tweet referring to Harris as a whore, Trump also called on fact-checkers to investigate.
These were not the only unexpected charges Republicans unveiled. Conservative commentator Dinesh D’Souza revealed that Ms. Harris wasn’t really black at all since her parents were of Jamaican and Indian origin.
It had not been clear initially whether D’Souza, himself of Indian descent, would be deemed sufficiently white by conservative standards to invoke white people’s magical powers in connection with blackness, but non-immigrant Republicans okayed the charge.
“Black Voices for Trump” joined D’Souza in condemning Harris for attempting to pass as African-American in order to reap the copious social advantages that black people possess in American society.
As an alleged white suburban housewife observed, being black is a social definition, not a scientific one, and in the final analysis it is white people who make the rules.
“If we can say you’re black because one of your eight great-grandparents was of African descent,” stated the iconic white voter, apparently a sociologist or historian, “we can certainly revoke blackness when we choose to. As the great Supreme Court Justice Roger Taney stated in the Dred Scott case, members of the African race have ‘no rights that the white man was bound to respect.’”
“Let’s stick to the substantive issues,” tweeted Trump. “Can lily-white America bear another black person in or close to the presidency?”
